You may have noticed the rise of Corporate NDA culture, mainly comprising of gagging orders, confidentiality agreements, non-compete clauses, injunctions and even superinjunctions.
This matters. Especially in a so-called free society.
If you see something at work that your company relies on to make its money, this could be defined as a trade secret.
That is what Non Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) are supposed to be for.
If you sign one, you can’t talk about what you know.
E.g. the formula for Coca Cola or a design for a building or a new piece of technology.
There are supposed to be exceptions – if something criminal is going on, then technically you can break the NDA.
But in reality, few people do.
For fear of reprisals.
Having to pay back the money.
Being made homeless or losing one’s family.
Corporate Criminality is very hard to prove and few whistleblowers tend to know their rights, so large scale corporate criminality often goes unchecked.
In the following case a tumble dryer manufacturer is gagging its own customers to prevent them from telling the world the manufacturer sold them tumble dryers that catch fire.
In America victims of fracking have complained that flammable gas comes through their taps due to changes in the water table.
Many were gagged.
But these aren’t trade secrets. This is inconvenient truth.
For large corporates, it’s reputational risk.
The risk that fewer people will do business with you because you’ve taken short cuts on health and safety.
They’re effectively defrauding investors, consumers, the general public, the press, regulators, the government, and other people and entities with whom they do business.
News is what a chap who doesn’t care much about anything wants to read. And it’s only news until he’s read it. After that it’s dead.Evelyn Waugh
“News is something somebody doesn’t want printed; all else is advertising.”Randolph Hearst
I Never Argue with a Man Who Buys Ink by the BarrelAnon.
In the banking industry, victims of bank fraud are frequently gagged by the bank after having been defrauded.
They typically accept such conditions to be allowed to access a sum equal to just a small fraction of the amount of money that the bank will have stolen.
(I’m not using any names here so I think I am on safe ground!)
Here is the Mail piece on Tumble Dryer NDAs.
Note the use of “Stay silent or” in the box on the right.
Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein famously gagged many of his victims and his own secretary (using London-based law firms) to protect his reputation.
Was the delivery of sexual assault, in pure business terms, an essential part of the business model?
How else could you justify covering up rape as a trade secret?
If a film producer’s reputation is treated as non-tangible “Good Will”, “Intellectual Property” or even a “tradeable asset” then it follows that an organisation will want to leverage its assets and trade on its perceived value.
I am not saying that NDAs for sexual violence are morally acceptable, but under the guilt-free, shame-free, profit-maximising psychopathic conventions that govern corporations, such behaviour makes perfect sense.
By protecting the “Brand” you protect the shareholders, which you are legally obliged to..
So in the case of Weinstein hiring ex-Israeli Military intelligence investigators Black Cube to go after rape victims, this would have just been his company checking up on a few routine compliance matters.
It’s where the free market logic takes us.
Using the idea of information as a tangible, legal, biological unit that can be deployed to one’s favour or detriment, the metaphor takes on a new potency.
Here is the original Edward Bernays article entitled Engineering of Consent:Engineering_of_consent
Now that elections have been announced in the UK, we can expect a lot more skewed reporting with a sprinkling of strategic silence.