Billionaire Tory Donor’s MP son being prosecuted with lower urgency level than man who allegedly attacked PM’s homes speaks volumes re: UK misogyny, power, & corruption.
Patrick Spencer, son of billionaire Tory Lord Michael Spencer, is being charged by the Special Crime Division nearly two years after it’s alleged that he sexually assaulted two separate women at the Groucho Club in London in 2023.
If the trial goes ahead we need to know when the police were informed of the incident and why he was allowed to become an MP if his party, the police and the CPS already knew about these unresolved allegations.
Could it be that Spencer has been treated as though these allegations will go away and eventually they haven’t?
Could it be that the authorities have done their best to downplay and turn a blind eye to these serious accusations but have ultimately failed to successfully cover them up?
Why has the attack on the PM’s home been treated as violent crime but not the sexual assault allegations?
Is there a difference in the sense of urgency that the CPS prosecutions run by the Special Crime Division compared to Counter Terrorism?
This means that the CPS may once more be covering up Tory rape just as it covered up Jimmy Savile the Church, Westminster VIP and Prince Andrew’s alleged paedophilia
