As Richard Sanders of Double Down states, the news plastered the Golders Green story all over the papers claiming it was an Iranian attack – but now it seems the four young men who pleaded guilty were all paid to do it and we don’t know who paid them.
How can that be?
Why would they all plead guilty and none of them reveal the name of the organiser?
Had the original press reports proven true then we would rightly have an Iranian regime organiser being up in court for organising a terror attack.
Do they think we are stupid?
There is also a fifth defendant, Suban Ahmed, who has been accused of aiding and abetting the other four by helping them dispose of their car.
He is pleading not guilty and is in court in January.
Had the four plead not guilty then there would at least have been an actual trial – it looks like they have been duped on many levels – both into attacking the ambulance but also ironically into aiding and abetting the authorities who want this all swept under the carpet and away from prying eyes pdq.
Here are some screenshots of the article
It’s quite funny to see BBC reporter Dominic Casciani refer to a shadowy group – I wonder if he chose that term or if MI5 put it in there because they didn’t think the original would get sceptical readers sufficiently triggered.
The comments below Richard Sanders’s post on X are referring to the attack as a false flag paid for by Israel.
Trust in the media and the police and courts is such that this kind of conclusion is now perfectly normal – you’d be rightly considered quite naive if you bought into the official narrative on this one.
