A Paedophile’s Principles

David Aaronovitch sticks up for Harvey Proctor

Perhaps it’s because he works for (crime) bosses Rebekah Brooks, John Witherow, & Rupert Murdoch that David Aaronovitch propagates quite as he does.

Maybe it’s just co-incidence that he consistently pushes the same views as Rupert Murdoch.

Or could it be that Aaronovitch is a gun for hire who long ago gave up the right to deviate from the family line?

Today’s opinion piece in The Times is singularly one-sided.

Aaronovitch refers to Proctor as a “former Tory MP who bravely went public about the allegations made against him” .

But makes no mention of the fact that uber racist Proctor admitted to beating up under age rent boys. That’s why he is a former Tory MP. Proctor also boasted of holidaying in Tunisia – notorious for the availability of young boys for sex.

Aaronovitch clearly doesn’t care about the suffering of the Child Sexual Abuse survivors whose information was contained in the missing Dickinson files.

He doesn’t mention Dolphin Square or Elm Guest House which is in Zac Goldsmith’s constituency which might explain why he has a more informed view on the matter.

Keith Vaz of course worked at Richmond Council while the alleged Elm Guest House incidents were reputed to have taken place. He shut down an investigation into Keith Janner in the early 90s and was head of the Home Affairs Select Committee when Mark Sedwill answered, on behalf of Theresa May, the questions that needed to be asked about what happened to the files that were given to Brittan.

Sedwill’s comments were openly indifferent as to what had happened to the files. He said he didn’t suspect foul play. Very different to how he behaved when he arranged for Gavin Williamson to be sacked for supposedly leaking the government’s Huawei stance to the Telegraph.

Aaronovitch never mentioned Cyril Smith or David Steel’s reluctance to kick him out of the party for being a paedophile. The Aaronovitch view, like Boris Johnson, appears to be that money spent on investigating Child Sexual Abuse is money spaffed up a wall.

Does he suppose we all believe Savile acted alone? Savile, who was well connected, close to the Tory Party, and a Special Friend of Israel, like Daddy Murdoch.

Though Aaronovitch has a go at the BBC for broadcasting Beech’s allegations, no mention is made of the Head of News at that time.

It was none other than James Harding, the former editor of . . . The Times.

I smell a stitch-up.

Pick an obviously disturbed individual. Give them lots of attention. Then reveal they are lying. And everyone can forget about the original large scale, systemic establishment paedophilia. The Catholic Church have been doing this for hundreds of years. It isn’t new.

It looks to me as though the police co-operated with Murdoch and other agencies to allow a “witch-hunt” to take place to then let it die down.

Jonathan King, the pop svengali who was done for paedophilia, is having a field day. Tweeting away. His bail by the way was put up by Simon Cowell. He is spoken highly of by Rod Liddle.

The Beech case, which should never have got to court, is being used to discredit real victims. And police and health spending cuts today mean that real victims of paedophila often never get justice.


But no worries for Aaronovitch and Tom Watson. Not their problem.

They have their paymasters to please.

Establishment bandwagons to jump on or hijack.

The Krays / Boothby model seems to be the template.

They’ve done it before so they’ll do it again.

But what about Jeffrey Epstein? Things get interesting there. Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine is close to him. Prince Andrew. Trump. God knows who else. Looks like establishment paedophilia again.

They have lots of secrets. And they’re starting to come out. Everyone seems to be blackmailing each other. Things could get interesting.

Roy Cohn (see previous post) worked for Murdoch. And Trump. He died of AIDS in 1986. But they’re both still around. And it looks like they use the same methods. Jared Kushner’s dad does too.

If that means paedophilia, prostitutes, honey traps, kompromat, then that is what it is.

Old school.

And if that is what was used by the Brits in Ireland and elsewhere, then that too.

You can’t change the past. Or the bad habits of today if they’re proven to work.

But for now, we’re being told that all the allegations are false.

Yes, Beech’s allegations may be false.

But that doesn’t mean all these people are innocent.

Also from today’s Times:


Comments

  • Superb incisive article Ranjan, an old school bait and switch by the Establishment and for the protection of the Establishment is indeed afoot.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophrastus
    c. 371 – c. 287 BC
    XXVI. The Oligarch (xxix)
    “The Oligarchical temper would seem to consist in a love of authority, covetous, not of gain, but of power.
    The Oligarch is one who, when the people are deliberating whom they shall associate with the archon as joint directors of the procession, will come forward and express his opinion that these directors ought to have plenary powers; and, if others propose ten, he will say that ‘one is sufficient,’ but that ‘he must be a man.’. Of Homer’s poetry, he has mastered only this line, —
    No good comes of a manifold rule; let the ruler be one:
    of the rest, he is absolutely ignorant.”

    Theophratus.

    https://isgp-studies.com/belgian-x-dossiers-of-the-dutroux-affair#british-cases

  • https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Barbara_Castle#cite_ref-9
    Paedophile dossier
    In July 2014, it was revealed that the late Baroness Castle had compiled a paedophile dossier in the 1980s and had handed it to Don Hale, the editor of her local newspaper, the Bury Messenger. Lady Castle put together 30 pages of information about alleged attempts by the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) to infiltrate government while seeking funding and trying to persuade MPs to legalise sex with children. As well as key members of both the Commons and Lords, she found that about 30 prominent businessmen, public school teachers, scoutmasters and police officers had links to PIE. Mr Hale, 61, said:

    “Barbara was horrified at the rapid extent of PIE’s involvement with key people and her file included details of about 16 household-name MPs.”
    He said Lady Castle – who at the time was Euro MP Barbara Castle – passed him the dossier and asked if he would write a story based on it.

    “I agreed to run something the following week but obviously had to contact certain MPs named – from the Labour, Liberal and Conservative parties – and the Home Office for their responses. The next day, Cyril Smith came to my office. He must have heard about it, or been sent by, the former Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe. Cyril tried to persuade me that it was ‘all poppycock’. He said Barbara had her ‘knickers in a twist’ since leaving the House and had become bored with wine lakes and sugar mountains in Europe. He played down the whole episode and wanted an assurance that I wouldn’t run anything. I couldn’t give that and he went away very disappointed. The next day the heavy mob arrived. Two or three police in uniform and half a dozen in plain clothes. They came at 8am, before most people had arrived for work, and showed me warrant cards and a D-Notice and something signed by a Judge. They threatened me with five to ten years in prison and took away my notebooks and all the papers Barbara had given me. It was a threat to national security, and not in the public interest, they told me. If I had said no, I would have been arrested. I had to give them assurances I had given them everything. They told me not to tell anyone, and the whole thing was over within half an hour.”
    Mr Hale went on to be a campaigning editor at the Matlock Mercury newspaper known for his investigation that led to the freeing of Stephen Downing, wrongly jailed for the “Bakewell Tart” murder. But he said it was the incident with the Lady Castle dossier that sparked his determination to expose cover-ups:

    “Barbara had been a long-serving local MP and used to come and have a chat with me every couple of weeks. We had talked about a potential paedophile ring with MPs before, but she said no one would listen. She asked me if I would take a look and run a story from her point of view. She objected to any funding of this organisation PIE, and was very concerned about the speed of their infiltration and the number of prominent names who were allegedly supporting them. Barbara was horrified, too, at the prospect of Parliament approving legalised sex with children, often under the guise of educating them, and mentioned an influx of rent boys and unsavoury and unfortunate situations that had been covered up by the authorities.”
    Mr Hale said she had not been surprised when he told her about the visit from Special Branch:

    [R]
    “She sort of expected it. This was a powerful organisation and she reluctantly admitted she was fighting a formidable foe. She apologised for the hassle it caused me. It was 30 years ago, so I can’t remember the names and full details, but I was sworn to secrecy by Special Branch at the risk of jail if I repeated any of the allegations.”[9]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar